Finding Conflict In a story by Jules Vernes
INTRODUCTION
Many stories have been made by The great
writers. People have noticed every different story from every author. I already
prepared one story to discuss, In The
Year 2889 by Jules Verne. In the year
2889 is an 1889 short story published under the name of Jules Verne, but now
believed to be mainly the work of his son Michel Verne, based on his father’s
ideas. Jules Verne was a French novelist; and his profound influence on the
literary genre of science fiction. In 1885, James Gordon Bennett, Jr., owner of
the New York Herald (the same man who
sent Stanley to Africa to find Livingstone) asked Jules Verne to write a short
story about life in United States a thousand years hence.
Ironically, the
resulting tale was not printed until1889—and not in the New York Herald. It is unusual work in every way. Verne wrote few short
stories, and no others first published in English. In contrast to his
conservative, plodding SF novels, “In The Year2889” dashes wildly from one
fanciful extrapolation to another. Experts believe Jules’ son Michel may have
authored part of the story. Many predictions for the year 2889 come true.
Verne’s dystopian concept of one man brought to vast power and wealth through
widely distributed intellectual property brings to mind names like Samuel
Newhouse and Bill Gates. There are also glimmerings of later science fiction
themes, including suspended animation and turning the moon around a la Arthur
C. Clarke’s Childhood End (1953). Of
course Verne also made mistakes, and some of his prediction simply have no come
to pass. But give them time: there are nearly nine centuries left before the
year 2889.
But for now I
would like to discuss some conflicts in Jules Vernes’ In The Year 2889. On this
Novel that we would like to discuss later, there is a lot of plot that can be
analyse, such as Plot; plot is series of episodes in narrative carried out by
the character. We easily found plot the first time we read this story. The
beginning of this story is the narrator talk about the past. Let me quote
something from the beginning “Little
though they seem to think of it, the people of this twenty-ninth century live
continually in fairyland. Surfeited as they are with marvels, they are
indifferent in presence of each new marvels” the story begin with narrator,
there is no her or him; it is the Narrator; it is a plot. Plot itself has a
concept : Rising Action, Conflict, Climax, Falling Action and
Resolution. But we only focused on the conflict of this story. Conflict is a
clash of ideas, actions, desires or wills of the main character. In this story
it is not that hard to find conflict. Conflicts itself got three types; Man
against Man, Man against Environment, and Man against Himself.
CONTENT
What is
conlflict? Conflict is a clash of ideas, actions, desires or wills of the main
character. The idea of this story it is found by its conflict. How the main
character, which his name is Mr. Fritz Napoleon Smith found himself in the
modern era of twenty-ninth century. How he handle himself from that era. How he
handle the environment of that era. How he struggle with himself In this era
and How he sometimes fought with his wife and other men such as Russian or
Chinese. We will discuss about that soon.
Conflict has
three types: Man Against Man, Man against Environment, and Man Against Himself.
In this short story, I found some conflicts Man against Man, when Mr. Smith and
Russian about something and Mr. Smith blame Chinese somehow. As we all can see,
this is Mr. Smith against this man Russian Man. Let me show you how it goes.
“how
is it,” he asked, turning to the Russian Ambassador, “that you Russians are not
content with your vast empire, the most extensive in the world, stretching from
the banks of the Rhine to the Celestial Mountains and The Kara-Korum, whose
shores are washed by the Frozen Ocean, the Atlantic, Mediterranean, and The
Indian Ocean? Then, what is the use of threats? Is war possible in view of
modern inventions-asphyxiating shells capable of being projected a distance of
60 miles, an electric spark of 90 miles, that can at one stroke annihilate a
battalion; to say nothing of the plague, the cholera, the yellow fever, that
the belligerents might spread among their antagonists mutually, and which would
in a few days destroy the greatest armies?
In this plot, we can see that Mr.Smith was being sarcastic and start to argue
by telling all Russians mistakes or not
“True,”
answered the Russian; “but can we do all that we wish? As for us Russians pressed on our eastern frontier by the
Chinese, we must at any cost put forth our strength for an effort toward the
west” in this statement, accept his argue and
blame Chinese somehow, by doing that, Russians start a conflict with Mr. Smith;
Man Against Man.
If it is the
example of Man against Man, I want to show you the example from this
story of Man against Environment. This conflict itself for me is simply
by doing a daily activity and have a problem within that. This part of the
story tell us how an environment affect out daily basic.
“A campaign against the annexation that has
been an accomplished fact for 150 years!” rxclaimed Mr. Smith “how cam your
people supposed that I would do anything so unpatriotic?” just like Man Against Man, this environment
force Mr.Smith to acted like that. He didn’t mean that. The environment made
him to. That’s him, against his own environment. Here is some words that
narrator-somehow- explain about this conflict.
“for Mr.Smith, being aboveall a practical
man; instead of the endless suites of apartements oh the olden time, one room
fitted with ingenious mechanical contrivances is enough. Here he sleeps, takes
his meals, in short, lives.”
The third and
the last types of conflict is Man Against Himself. For
me, myself, it is the most important types than the first nor the second ones.
This types teach us to be strong, to handle our own feeling; because sometimes,
heart and mind cannot
be together. Here is some the examples that I took from the story where Mr.
Smith begin to had this tyoe of conflict.
“he seat himself. in the mirror of the
phonotelephore is seen the same chamber at Paris which appeared in it this
morning. A table furnished forth is likewise in readiness here, for
notwithstanding the difference of hours, Mr. Smith and his wife have arranged
to take their meals simultaneously” maybe this one is not quite good for
some example. But for ones who look more closely, that paragraph explain a lot
that Mr. Smith has been trhough a lot of rough time. This one maybe best
example for this type of conflict:
“left to himself, feeling tired, he lay down
on an extension chair. Then, touching a knob, he established communication with the Centra Concert Hall, whence our
greatest maestros send out to subscribes to their delightful successions”
he felt tired, he need a break. He had been fought with the same man over and
over again; himself. this type, taugh us that no matter how smart your brain
works, it does not always match with your heart, right?
CONCLUSION
Above
all, you can learn what it feels like what is taste like tp have a conflict.
Conflict is not that you have fight with other person. You know by now (if you
read all of them) that even environment can affect you to have conflict. And
can even fight with yourself. This Jules’ IN THE YEAR 2889 taugh me that
conflict is everywhere. It is around us and it is never stop to haunting and
testing us.
DINDA ALMASELLA RUSTAM (63715016)
Comments
Post a Comment